Founder, CEO & Strategist since 2001. Anders provides thoughts and reflections about how to think about onlinification and digitalisation in B2B.
Keep me updated!
Subscribe
When a CMO experiments with generative AI, it might improve campaign velocity. When a CTO explores AI copilots, it might streamline code. When a COO deploys AI in operations, it might unlock efficiencies.
But transformation becomes possible if the owners lean in—when boards, founders, and investors make AI a strategic, organisation-wide priority.
We're not talking about marginal improvements. We're talking about a fundamental change in how knowledge is processed, decisions are made, products are developed, and customers are engaged.
It's the kind of shift that redefines industry baselines like electricity or the internet.
That's why AI, especially generative AI, can't be left as an isolated initiative owned by the "tech side of the house". It must become a strategic concern at the ownership level, or organisations risk becoming modern in appearance but outdated in practice.
For publicly traded companies, AI commitment must be signalled outwardly. When investors hear about "AI pilots", it sounds cautious — maybe even slow. What they want to hear is clarity of direction:
"We are building a company that leverages AI to rethink how value is delivered, not just how costs are reduced."
Contrast that with companies whose earnings are stable but show no AI urgency—they risk becoming less relevant and less interesting to both the market and top talent.
In owner-led or family-owned businesses, the dynamics are different — and more intimate.
Founders and owners often ask:
The challenge? Much of what matters with generative AI can't be measured in traditional terms yet:
These aren't costs — they're capabilities. They may not show up in Q2, but they shape your next 20 quarters.
These aren't just tech initiatives — they're ownership-level commitments to staying relevant in the long term.
Executives can automate tasks, and departments can become more efficient. But that's not transformation—that's optimisation.
True transformation comes when the top of the organisation realises that AI is not just about doing the same things faster — it's about doing fundamentally different things:
These aren't departmental decisions. They're ownership-level ones.
Owners must now be learners, board members must ask different questions, and founders must stretch their comfort zones.
And yes, leading into something that can't be fully measured yet is hard. However, thriving companies don't wait for a clear playbook before embracing the Internet, mobile, or cloud. They committed, learned, and adapted.
As William Gibson said:
"The future is already here — it's just not evenly distributed."
Think about:
The signal to act doesn't come from a spreadsheet but from the top.
If you're a board member, founder, or owner, the real question isn't "Should we explore AI?" It's:
"How do we ensure our organisation builds the capabilities and culture to thrive in an AI-shaped world?"
If that question isn't being asked at the ownership level, it isn't being answered anywhere.